Why Singapore’s English Teachers Should Embrace Singlish, Not Fight It
Is it time for Singaporean educators to embrace Singlish as a legitimate learning tool? What the Research […]
Read More
Relative to CCE lessons, the Hope PPI was found to be more effective in preventing the worsening of students’ self-reported depressive symptoms, and increasing the use of deep and elaborative learning strategies
Pioneered by Martin Seligman in the late 1990s, positive psychology is a movement within psychology that focuses on understanding and promoting well-being and examining factors that lead to optimal human functioning. Research shows that increasing students’ well-being can lead to improvements in their learning.
In a Singapore-based study, the principles of positive psychology were applied in developing three PPI packages, which focused on Gratitude, Hope, and Strengths. The application of two PPIs, Gratitude and Hope, has yielded promising results with students in the Normal Academic and Technical streams, while the Strengths PPI is still in the process of development. The results of the study indicate that the Gratitude and Hope PPIs are potentially effective in cultivating students’ positive emotions and well-being, and promoting students’ intrinsic motivation to study and their use of productive learning strategies.
The nurturing of positivity in the classroom therefore carries tremendous potential benefits for students in terms of both academic and non-academic outcomes. Combining the two PPIs offers a longer immersion of the students to positive psychology experiences that can potentially compound the PPIs’ positive effects. However, it needs to be emphasized that the positive effects of the PPIs, as the results of the study suggest, may take some time to manifest.
The Gratitude and Hope interventions are premised on Barbara Fredrickson’s (1998, 2001) broaden and build framework.
The theory specifies different functional roles for positive and negative emotions. Negative emotions, such as sadness or anxiety, are thought to narrow an individual’s perception of events, thereby limiting how one thinks and responds to the events.
On the other hand, positive emotions are expected to broaden a person’s mindset towards events, which favours the expansion of how one thinks and behaves in response to the events. The broadened mindset, in turn, enables the building of one’s physical, intellectual, and social resources.
The present study is one of the few studies that provide some empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of PPIs among local students and the capability of local teachers to implement PPIs in a classroom setting.
Teachers may adopt the PPIS as stand-alone activities during CCE classes, as was done in this study, or integrate the PPIs into their classroom lessons.
The following project is associated with Nurturing Positivity Research:
To learn more about Nurturing Positivity, please contact the Principal Investigator Dr Imelda S Caleon at imelda.caleon@nie.edu.sg
Principal Investigator
Co-Principal Investigators
Collaborators
Research Assistant:
This research on Nurturing Positivity was funded by Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) under the Education Research Funding Programme (OER 06/13 RBK) and administered by National Institute of Education (NIE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Singapore MOE and NIE.
This knowledge resource was written by Mr Edmund Teo and Ms Tan Giam Hwee in June 2017; updated by Ms Monica Lim on 4 January 2022.