Knowledge Resource Bank

Investigating CCAs

Discover the potential of CCAs for seamless learning transfer, character development, and cohesion among international and NA students.

Investigating Co-Curricular Activities (CCAs) as Learning Contexts

How Findings from Investigating CCAs Can Help Your Students

  • Investigating CCAs revealed that CCAs:
    • Afforded a range of learning opportunities that may support learning transfer across CCA and classroom contexts
    • Development of character traits is constituted in the practice of accomplishing CCA tasks
    • Supported students’ learning that was largely participatory and collaborative
    • Promoted social integration and cohesion, particularly among students from the Normal Academic stream, and international students or those new to the Singapore educational system

Question-Icon Why Investigating CCAs?

Investigating CCAs was motivated by the governmental interest in CCA [formerly known as extracurricular activities (ECAs)] as key for holistic education (Ministry of Education [MOE], 2010) and for developing life skills and character in students (Education Ministers Heng, 2011; Ng, 2008; Teo, 2000).

CCAs in Singapore ~ a brief history

First introduced in 1959, after the state gained self-governance, ECAs aimed to foster social cohesion among students (Gwee, Doray, Waldhauser & Ahmad, 1969). Since then, ECAs have occupied a central place in the school curriculum. Today, CCAs have been integrated with educational initiatives linked to the learning of 21st century skills and competencies (Heng, 2012; MOE, 2010).


Question-Icon How Was the Research Carried out?


Question-Icon Evidence from Investigating CCAs

  • CCA as Learning Contexts
    • provided a range of learning opportunities
    • is situated and highly context dependent
    • learning in CCAs is situated and highly context dependent
    • some CCAs were more transformative than others in shaping students’ character

  • Characteristics of Students’ Learning in CCAs
    • Participatory and collaborative
      • students typically worked in teams where skills and competencies of each member complemented each other
    • Development of students’ character traits occurred while accomplishing CCA tasks
    • Evidence of some links in learning across CCA participation and classroom-based disciplinary academic learning, as reported by student participants
    • Acquisition of skills and knowledge sometimes served as a precursor to classroom-based academic learning, as reported by student participants
    • Competition and winning as key drivers in motivating and uniting members towards CCA goals

  • Social Integration in CCAs
    • CCA promoted social integration through development and fostering of bonding and friendship that often came from working in teams.
    • Access to all CCA participation was not equal as entry to some CCAs was largely based on PSLE scores.
    • Unequal access to CCA participation was mediated by efforts of CCA teachers in-charge, which involved recruiting students with particular competencies that were valued by the CCA in focus.


Question-Icon What Does this Mean for CCA Education in Schools?

  • Curriculum planners, school leaders, and teachers may explore greater connectedness between learning in academic and CCA curricula, including after-school or out-of-school organized activities as ways to widen students’ contexts of learning and of acquiring literacies
  • CCAs may be envisioned as multiple contexts of advanced, sophisticated, and expanded learning spaces, including enhancing classroom-based disciplinary academic learning, not just building students’ dispositions.


Question-Icon Further Readings



Question-Icon Research Team

To learn more about this research, please contact Research Fellow Dr David HUNG Wei Loong at david.hung@nie.edu.sg.

Principal Investigator

Research Fellow

  • Dr CHONG Sau Kew (formerly of NIE)

Acknowledgments

Investigating CCAs was funded by the Education Research Funding Programme, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (project no. OER 31/12 LA). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Singapore MOE and NIE.

This knowledge resource was extracted and reconstructed from the published materials of the research team, and presented by Ms Tan Giam Hwee in October 2020; updated by Ms Monica Lim and Jared Martens Wong on 3 January 2021.

Never Miss A Story