Investigating CCAs
Investigating Co-Curricular Activities (CCAs) as Learning Contexts
- Investigating CCAs revealed that CCAs:
- Afforded a range of learning opportunities that may support learning transfer across CCA and classroom contexts
- Development of character traits is constituted in the practice of accomplishing CCA tasks
- Supported students’ learning that was largely participatory and collaborative
-
Promoted social integration and cohesion, particularly among students from the Normal Academic stream, and international students or those new to the Singapore educational system
Why Investigating CCAs?
Investigating CCAs was motivated by the governmental interest in CCA [formerly known as extracurricular activities (ECAs)] as key for holistic education (Ministry of Education [MOE], 2010) and for developing life skills and character in students (Education Ministers Heng, 2011; Ng, 2008; Teo, 2000).
CCAs in Singapore ~ a brief history
First introduced in 1959, after the state gained self-governance, ECAs aimed to foster social cohesion among students (Gwee, Doray, Waldhauser & Ahmad, 1969). Since then, ECAs have occupied a central place in the school curriculum. Today, CCAs have been integrated with educational initiatives linked to the learning of 21st century skills and competencies (Heng, 2012; MOE, 2010).
How Was the Research Carried out?
- Investigating CCAs adopts an ethnographic perspective to research. Concepts grounded in social learning and New Literacy Studies, and multiple research tools (i.e., participant observations, semi-structured interviews, observational fieldnotes, photographs of artefacts etc.) were used to investigate the study.
- Learn more about the research methodology: Researching Pupils’ Participation in School-Based Co-Curricular Activities Through an Ethnographic Case Study of Learning
Evidence from Investigating CCAs
- CCA as Learning Contexts
- provided a range of learning opportunities
- is situated and highly context dependent
- learning in CCAs is situated and highly context dependent
- some CCAs were more transformative than others in shaping students’ character
- Characteristics of Students’ Learning in CCAs
- Participatory and collaborative
- students typically worked in teams where skills and competencies of each member complemented each other
- Development of students’ character traits occurred while accomplishing CCA tasks
- Evidence of some links in learning across CCA participation and classroom-based disciplinary academic learning, as reported by student participants
- Acquisition of skills and knowledge sometimes served as a precursor to classroom-based academic learning, as reported by student participants
- Competition and winning as key drivers in motivating and uniting members towards CCA goals
- Participatory and collaborative
- Social Integration in CCAs
- CCA promoted social integration through development and fostering of bonding and friendship that often came from working in teams.
- Access to all CCA participation was not equal as entry to some CCAs was largely based on PSLE scores.
- Unequal access to CCA participation was mediated by efforts of CCA teachers in-charge, which involved recruiting students with particular competencies that were valued by the CCA in focus.
What Does this Mean for CCA Education in Schools?
- Curriculum planners, school leaders, and teachers may explore greater connectedness between learning in academic and CCA curricula, including after-school or out-of-school organized activities as ways to widen students’ contexts of learning and of acquiring literacies
- CCAs may be envisioned as multiple contexts of advanced, sophisticated, and expanded learning spaces, including enhancing classroom-based disciplinary academic learning, not just building students’ dispositions.
Related Links
- ReEd Vol 23 2018 “Learning Through Co-Curricular Activities” [PDF]
- ReEd Vol 20 2016 “Co-Curricular Activities as Learning Spaces” [PDF]
- Research Brief Series, No. 16-015, “Exploring Learning Spaces in School-Based Co-Curricular Activities”
Further Readings
- For educators interested in the research methodology behind Investigating CCAs, you may refer to:
Research Projects
Research Team
To learn more about this research, please contact Research Fellow Dr David HUNG Wei Loong at david.hung@nie.edu.sg.
Principal Investigator
-
Prof David HUNG Wei Loong, Office of Education Research (OER), NIE
Research Fellow
- Dr CHONG Sau Kew (formerly of NIE)
Acknowledgments
Investigating CCAs was funded by the Education Research Funding Programme, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (project no. OER 31/12 LA). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Singapore MOE and NIE.
This knowledge resource was extracted and reconstructed from the published materials of the research team, and presented by Ms Tan Giam Hwee in October 2020; updated by Ms Monica Lim and Jared Martens Wong on 3 January 2021.