Why Singapore’s English Teachers Should Embrace Singlish, Not Fight It
Is it time for Singaporean educators to embrace Singlish as a legitimate learning tool? What the Research […]
Read More
Previously, collecting data like EEG from students had its difficulties. Unlike the low cost, lightweight, wireless, mobile EEG headsets used in this project, conventional EEG systems tended to be very expensive, cumbersome to set up and uncomfortable for students.
One could hence infer that before the emergence of these low cost EEG headsets, measuring electrical brain activities of students in a classroom setting was not likely to be possible.
Therefore, these low cost EEG headsets bring about new possibilities to:
Collect EEG data that is ecologically-valid, in situ, large-scale and school-based!

Image 1: What is Electroencephalography (EEG)? (view larger image)
Test anxiety is a non-trivial and prevalent problem for school-going children around the world, especially in societies with high-stakes examinations. According to a study by von der Embse, Barterian, & Segool, 2013, 10-40% of students, some as young as age 7, suffer from test anxiety.
The Detriments of Test Anxiety
Potentially detrimental to children’s psychological well-being and performance, test anxiety can limit children’s test performance and hinder future educational and career progression. Unfortunately, test anxiety is also associated with negative outcomes ranging from low achievement, depression, and suicide ideation.
Hence early intervention in schools to equip students with emotional management skills, can mitigate such adverse effects of test anxiety (Khng and Mane, 2020). One such intervention, could be the introduction of deep breathing as a technique to help students with test anxiety.
The research consisted of a pilot study and a main study. In the pilot study involving P5 students, EEG data was collected to compare the quality and pattern of EEG data between a consumer-grade EEG device and a clinical-grade EEG device.
In the main study involving both P5 and S1 students, a comparison between a deep breathing intervention group and a control group of students was made to measure pre-to-post-test changes in:
For educators interested in the research methodology behind Investigating CCAs, you may refer to:
To learn more about this research, please contact Principal Investigator at kiathui.khng@nie.edu.sg.
Principal Investigator
Dr KHNG Kiat Hui, Office of Education Research (OER), NIE
Co-Principal Investigator
Prof Kerry LEE (formerly of NIE)
Collaborators
Deep Breathing was funded by the Education Research Funding Programme, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (project no. OER 08/15 KKH). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Singapore MOE and NIE.
This knowledge resource based on OER 08/15 KKH was represented by Ms Tan Giam Hwee in October 2020, updated by Ms Monica Lim and Mr Jared Martens Wong on 11 January 2022.