• Home
  • Office of Education Research
  • National Institute of Education

singteach
Follow Us:

  • Home
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Team
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
    • Issue 74 (Sep 2020)
    • Issue 73 (Jun 2020)
    • Issue 72 (Mar 2020)
    • Issue 71 (Dec 2019)
    • Issue 70 (Sep 2019)
    • Issue 69 (Jun 2019)
    • View all
  • Topics
    • COVID-19
    • Home-based learning
    • Virtual learning
    • Technology
    • View All
  • Virtual Staff Lounge
  • Resources
    • Knowledge Resource Bank


Home › issue 50 sep / oct 2014 › Explaining Science PRO-fessionally

Explaining Science PRO-fessionally

Is there a mental structure that can help students answer science questions? Two teachers work hand in hand with NIE researchers to help their students articulate their explanations better.

Most students can make simple observations about a phenomenon, but it becomes a more challenging task when they have to use the right terms to explain their observations.

“One of the issues that I see with the girls here is their ability to use scientific terms,” shares Mrs Ken Oh Sihua, Acting Head of Department of Science at CHIJ Saint Joseph’s Convent (SJC). “They use words and descriptions of their own understanding, but it doesn’t translate to a scientific understanding.”

The Subject Head of Physics at Northbrooks Secondary School, Mr Sim Yong Ming, shares the same sentiment. When it comes to open-ended questions, students may have the content knowledge but many struggle with the structure of an explanation.

They decided to work with NIE researchers by participating in an NIE research project to address this problem.

Working with Researchers

Led by Dr Tang Kok Sing, the project focuses on developing strategies for teaching the language of Science. Both researchers and teachers agree that the teachers’ current strategies should not be changed drastically.

“It was important to the researchers and us that we not change our teaching style, but explore how we could continue to teach in our own style while adopting the new approaches that were introduced,” Ken elaborates.

After 6 months of classroom observation, Kok Sing sat down with the teachers to ask how they were coping. They also discuss a few approaches that the teachers could try out.

“The NIE researchers and the teachers worked hand in hand to come up with some strategies,” Yong Ming says. “With their research point of view and our classroom experience, we made something workable and practical in the classroom.”

As Yong Ming was already using the Predict-Explain-Observe-Explain model in his Physics classroom, they implemented an approach to complement it and help with the Explain steps.

Principle, Reasoning, Outcome

They then implemented the Principle-Reasoning-Outcome (PRO) approach in explaining any phenomenon. Using this, students will indicate the principle or premise that the scientific theory is based on, provide a reasoning for why the phenomenon is happening based on the principle, and state its outcome.

“Many students do not know the structure of the explanation, or scientific logical reasoning,” explains Yong Ming. “The PRO approach provides them with a guide to put what they know into words and sentences that are appropriate for the subject.”

To help his students, he prepares worksheets for them, starting with a basic flowchart. This provides a mental structure that guides them in writing an explanation. First, are there scientific keywords that they need to use? Yong Ming begins by giving his students keywords first to help them identify and unpack their meaning.

Next, what are the connectors to use? He then provides them with language structure and connectors that can help in the building of the explanation.

Finally, does the answer address all parts of the questions? Ken explains that students are often not as meticulous in their reasoning as they should be.

Encouraging Students to Explore

The PRO model can be incorporated easily into the Science classroom to accompany demonstrations, hands-on activities or videos.

Students are encouraged to write down their first thoughts about a phenomenon or an idea, and then discuss why they think that way. “We don’t put them down immediately if they are wrong,” Ken says. “In terms of correcting them, we question them, and they actually get to realize by themselves that they are on the wrong path.”

It is vital to allow students to make mistakes so they can remember and learn from it. Through such exploring, they can become more vocal and willing to experiment. Ken adds, smiling, “It’s a bit of endurance training for me, and it tests my patience as well!”

Allowing for Mistakes

To teach students about chemical bonding, Ken Oh Sihua from CHIJ Saint Joseph’s Convent uses the Principle-Reasoning-Outcome approach and complements it by letting them make mistakes and then realize it on their own.

She starts her lesson by showing a video about what happens when sodium chloride melts. Throughout the video, she would pause here and there to ask questions and get the class to fill up a customized worksheet, which requires the students to fill in the blanks and draw.

“As the teachers predicted, students just broke up the ionic compounds in their drawings,” Ken notes. “We were able to pick out a couple of misconceptions there especially when we moved on to water. When ice melts into water, the molecules are still intact, it’s still H2O. But the girls actually drew it as H on its own, and O on its own, so they actually broke down the entire molecule.”

This is when Ken prompts them with simple questions to make them realize their mistake. “I asked them very simple questions like ‘What is the chemical formula for ice?’ and the students will tell us it’s H2O,” she says. “And by the time I ask them again, ‘What about water? And gas?’ It’ll hit them and they’ll understand what I’m trying to tell them.”

Teachers Make a Difference

It is understandably not easy for teachers to tackle both the syllabus content and disciplinary literacy in depth, especially with time constraints.

However, Yong Ming points out that ultimately it is really about being aware of his actions and improving his existing teaching style. “Even before the project, I was already trying to excite my students,” he says. “But the project made me think of more meaningful ways to help them.”

Indeed, students became more enthusiastic about the subject after the implementation of the PRO approach. Ken shares that her students even asked if PRO can be introduced in lower secondary classes because they had such a lot of fun.

Yong Ming notes that according to research, students around the world are struggling with explanations. “But being part of this project brought about awareness that hey, we can do something about this problem.”

Ken echoes his sentiment. “In the past, I would think that certain things cannot be done,” she admits. “But now I know it’s important for teachers to try something new that might be good for the students. As Thomas Edison observed, even if things go wrong, at least you would’ve found one way that doesn’t work!”

Ken Oh Sihua is the Acting Head of Department of Science in CHIJ (St Joseph Convent). She has been teaching for 9 years. Sim Yong Ming is the Subject Head of Physics in Northbrooks Secondary School. He has been teaching for 4 years.

  • Print Article
  • Download PDF
Previous
Next

Articles you might like

  • Arguing to Learn

    Despite how it sounds, argumentation is not antagonistic! In fact, it drives both students and …

  • Finding the Right Words

    When it comes to Science, pupils may know the answer to a question, but not …

  • A Literature Review of Science Communication

    What is science communication and why does it matter for Science teachers? Our Guest Editor …

  • Explaining Science PRO-fessionally

    Is there a mental structure that can help students answer science questions? Two teachers work …

  • Articulation and Writing in Science

    What does it take for a pupil to be confident about Science? To a teacher …

  • The Importance of Effective Communication

    We communicate with others all the time. But how good are we at it? The …

Most Read Articles

  • Literature in the 21st Century 140,174 views
  • The Importance of Effective Communication 83,138 views
  • Self-expression through Art 15,743 views

Subscribe

I agree to the Terms & Conditions

Tags

Alternative assessment Assessment feedback Assistive technology Character-building Character education Classroom engagement Classroom Perspectives Classroom relationship Cognitive diagnostic assessments Dilemma-based Learning Disciplinary literacy Field trip Fieldwork Formative assessment History Holistic education Hot Topic Humanities Ideas Imagination Inclusive education Inspire Learner preferences Learning Learning environment Literature Review Multidisciplinary learning Music education Peer assessment People Redesigning Pedagogy Conference Research in Action Science Self-determination theory Share Student agency Teacher-student relationship Teacher research Teachers' Conference Test construction Test validity The Big Idea Trial and error Voices Working memory

research within reach
NTU Registration No: 200604393R
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Statement
  • Terms of Use
  • Supported by Marshall Cavendish Education
© 2021 NIE / NTU